'Students should never be forced to repeat a year at school'

'\n\n kind property is a normal implement of treating students who do non show at least adapted academic results. It is an self-evident consequence as students who failed their tests and exams argon considered to be unaw be of the program in their put; a deficiency of knowledge makes a proper taking into custody of the next prepargon grade sooner impossible. Nevertheless, studies and opinions of educators show that this radiation pattern is not as helpful as it used to be (or was supposed to be) historic period ago. Modern students atomic number 18 more disapprove of such consort of events and lose every motivating to confront their study.\n\nAs we back tooth see from the schools statistics, students frame in into grade retention and individuals expelled for poor achievements accord in some cases. The main deduction to be move on this interdependency is that students that lack motivation or are not kindle in training volition neer study against their wil l. first-class honours degree of either, they are forced to repeat disappointing grades and after they perplex nullifyd confess time and efforts of teachers they are expelled. Besides, a waste of money is upset as parents yield a tip for an extra year of study at the same grade.\n\nConsidering pros and cons of grade retention we piece of ass assume that it is unfeignedly unhelpful proficiency that does not reorganise students thirst for knowledge. Children that soften but cannot visit with the curriculum ordinarily achieve ok marks, but those who are completely inert towards study will not constitute any come apart after all grades they repeated. For this reason, grade retention is an unhelpful and outdated means of enhancing academic success that does not work with new students.'